Home › Features › Charge While You Climb

Charge While You Climb

Six. That is how many walks in the whole of the Lake District you can pair with a charging point you are actually allowed to use, at the place you park, on a walk long enough for the charge to be worth having. I expected the number to be small. I did not expect it to be six.

I drive a plug-in hybrid estate, which makes me roughly the easiest case there is — a small battery, a modest onboard charger, and a petrol engine to fall back on if none of it works out. If the Lake District is awkward for me, it is a good deal worse for anyone in a proper electric car. And it is awkward. The six walks are not spread across the Park; they are Grasmere, Coniston and Glenridding, three places you could tour in an afternoon. Rosthwaite and Stonethwaite — which are how you reach Great Gable and the Scafells — are more than eight kilometres from the nearest charger.

The gap, first

The honest headline is not how many trailheads have a charger. It is how few.

We publish parking for 157 places across the Lake District and its edges. Of those, 23 have a charging point of some kind within 250 m and 18 more within a kilometre — but 47 have nothing recorded within 5 km at all. Those are not obscure places. They are the valleys people drive to in order to walk.

Every one of those distances is a straight line to a charging point recorded in OpenStreetMap contributors (opens in new tab), so the real drive is longer. And they are a floor on the problem in the other direction too: a charger existing 4 km away is not the same as a charger you can use, at a power that means anything, while you are on the hill for five hours.

The walks that do work

These are all of them — 6 walks in the whole National Park that start within 600 m of parking with a verified, publicly usable charger beside it, and that take at least three hours. The three-hour floor is a judgement, not a measurement: below it the sums stop meaning anything, and calling a ninety-minute lake circuit “charge while you climb” would be selling you a rounding error.

Read the kWh as a ceiling and then take some off. It is the post’s rated power times our time estimate for the walk, and the thing most likely to make it smaller is your own car — see the method section.

Every charger we could verify

51 candidates were checked and 18 survived. The ones that did not are not hidden: they are named in the method section, with the reason.

How this was checked, and what it cannot tell you

There is no national list any more. The National Chargepoint Registry was decommissioned on 28 November 2024, and under the Public Charge Point Regulations 2023 every operator publishes its own open data while nobody is required to gather it up. So this was done the slow way: OpenStreetMap contributors (opens in new tab) as a lead list, and then each lead chased to the operator’s own page. 32 leads could not be confirmed that way and were dropped rather than published as unknowns.

• This is not a live map. We publish that a charger exists, what the operator says it delivers, and who may use it. Whether it is free, working and unblocked on the day is something only the operator’s app can tell you.
• The kWh figures are ceilings, not forecasts. They are the post’s rated power multiplied by our own time estimate for the walk. Your car will very likely take less: the onboard charger caps the AC rate, not the post, so a 22 kW post gives a 7.4 kW car 7.4 kW, and a plug-in hybrid may take 3.6. Some energy is lost as heat.
• We do not publish percentages, and we will not. Thirty-five kWh is most of a small battery and under half of a 77 kWh one. The percentage is yours to work out because only you know the pack.
• The gaps are absence of evidence. “We found no public charger within 5 km” is a statement about what we could find on 5 August 2026, not a claim that none exists. If you know of one, please tell us — that is the fastest way to make this page better.
• 32 candidates were never taken further. OpenStreetMap put us on to them and nothing else would confirm them, so they are not here. 4 more are listed by postcode alone, because the operator’s page names the place but we have no coordinate we would stand behind.

What I make of it

Spot a data error? Request a correction — every figure here is sourced and dated, and genuine mistakes are fixed promptly.

Nobody paid for a place on this page. No charging network, operator or car maker has been asked for, or has given, anything — the gaps are published as readily as the provision.

Cite or reuse this

Grab the citation (HTML): paste this to credit the report with a link back.

Media & data enquiries: lee@hikes.guide — journalists and teams are welcome to use these figures; the full CSV and per-chart embeds are above.

The data itself: chargers.json — every charger with its evidence URL and check date, every pairing with its arithmetic, and the full gap list of 47. Dated, and the same file this page is built from, so nothing here needs scraping.

Charger data compiled from operators’ own published information; candidate discovery and the gap distances use OpenStreetMap contributors (opens in new tab), ODbL. Compiled 5 August 2026.